The NSW Supreme Court has granted bail to Noah Touma after a judge raised significant questions regarding the strength of the prosecution’s case. Represented by Talal Krayem and barrister Ertunc Ozen, the defense successfully argued that the current evidence remains insufficient to secure a conviction.
Challenges to the Prosecution Case
During the bail hearing, Justice Ian Harrison expressed doubt over the likelihood of a guilty verdict. Specifically, the prosecution admitted that detectives could not determine a motive for the alleged incident. Furthermore, no established links exist between the client and the alleged target.
Justice Harrison highlighted several logical gaps in the crown case:
-
Lack of Disguise: The prosecution alleges the client used his own registered scooter without attempting to hide his identity.
-
No Discernible Motive: The court noted the absence of any reason why the accused would target a stranger.
-
Identification Concerns: Consequently, Justice Harrison stated it would be difficult for a jury to be satisfied of the shooter’s identity beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Bail Ruling
Because a potential trial may not proceed until 2026, the court considered the nine months the client has already spent in custody. Justice Harrison granted bail under strict conditions to ensure community safety and compliance:
-
Rehabilitation: The client must attend a live-in drug treatment facility.
-
Travel Restrictions: He has surrendered his passport to the authorities.
-
Communication: He is restricted to possessing only one mobile phone.
Ongoing Defense Strategy
The defense team at Krayem & Co maintains that the allegations lack the crucial evidence required for such serious charges, including attempted murder. This bail victory is a vital step in the judicial process. It allows the legal team to continue their work while the client begins his rehabilitation program.
The matter continues to move through the court system. We remain committed to ensuring a fair trial and a robust defense for our client.
